Background |
|||||||||||||
|
The people side of the public service is key to corruption prevention and the effective functioning of government. Human potential should be one of the main priorities of administrators, however, is often neglected. When looking into corruption prevention and effective governance, there is also a need to look at the human potential and skillset as part of the broader governance systems. In places where corruption is considered systemic, the implementation of any reforms might be challenging and slow and needs creative, systemic and long-term approaches to behavioral change among the people employed in the public service. There is an ongoing debate and research as to how public servants may be tempted to engage in corrupt activities and how they respond to potential benefits and incentives provided by anti-corruption measures. Behavioural research has been increasingly informing the efforts of policy makers to design innovative and targeted anti-corruption/integrity policies. The UN Pacific Regional Anti-Corruption (UN-PRAC) Project is a joint UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and UN Development Programme (UNDP) initiative, funded by the Australian Government and the New Zealand Aid Programme, aimed to support Pacific Island countries (PICs) to strengthen their national integrity systems. The Project is firmly anchored in the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) as the only international legally binding framework on how to prevent and fight corruption, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, notably Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 which calls for stronger action on anti-corruption, transparency and accountability. UNCAC article 7 (1) on the public sector requires State parties to endeavour to adopt, maintain and strengthen systems for the recruitment, hiring, retention, promotion and retirement of civil servants and, where appropriate, other non-elected public officials: (a) That are based on principles of efficiency, transparency and objective criteria such as merit, equity and aptitude; (b) That include adequate procedures for the selection and training of individuals for public positions considered especially vulnerable to corruption and the rotation, where appropriate, of such individuals to other positions; (c) That promote adequate remuneration and equitable pay scales, taking into account the level of economic development of the State party; (d) That promote education and training programmes to enable them to meet the requirements for the correct, honourable and proper performance of public functions and that provide them with specialized and appropriate training to enhance their awareness of the risks of corruption inherent in the performance of their functions. Such programmes may make reference to codes or standards of conduct in applicable areas. The Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) also directly or indirectly call upon an effective public service for successful implementation. In other words, the achievement of all SDGs is intrinsically linked with implementation of relevant public sector policies or provision of goods and, therefore, depend on the public service employees and officials to implement the necessary reforms and actions, including in a corrupt-free manner. The complexity and indivisibility of the 2030 Agenda is also calling for public servants with new mind-sets, oriented towards innovation and better solutions. An effective, efficient public service is also crucial for fight against corruption and promotion of good governance as envisaged by SDG 16 targets and indicators. Goal 16 also underpins the other sixteen SDGs, all of which rest on the capacities of the institutions and the human potential to respond to the needs of the public transparently, efficiently and accountably. |
|||||||||||||
Duties and Responsibilities |
|||||||||||||
|
Scope of Work For the first half of this consultancy, the consultant will work with UN-PRAC and the relevant stakeholders to develop a publication on public service effectiveness in the Pacific, with specific focus on application of behavioural insights into integrity of public servants. Using relevant Pacific Island country examples, the publication will:
The publication will be structured to include an Executive Summary which states the objective of the publication, the content of the publication and the recommendations made, an Introduction, Background, two sections on public service effectiveness, and a Conclusion including the recommendations. Appropriate infographics should be used where possible to ensure the publication is engaging. Each part of the publication must consider the Pacific context and provide relevant Pacific examples referenced appropriately in footnotes using consistent referencing style. Where Pacific examples are not available, those from Small Island Developing States should be considered.
Expected Outputs and Deliverables
Institutional Arrangement
Duration of the Work
Duty Station
|
|||||||||||||
Competencies |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Required Skills and Experience |
|||||||||||||
Experience
Price Proposal and Schedule of Payments Consultant must send a financial proposal based on Lump Sum Amount. The total amount quoted shall be all-inclusive and include all costs components required to perform the deliverables identified in the TOR, including professional fee, travel costs, living allowance (if any work is to be done outside the IC´s duty station) and any other applicable cost to be incurred by the IC in completing the assignment. The contract price will be fixed output-based price regardless of extension of the herein specified duration. Payments will be done upon completion of the deliverables and as per below percentages:
In general, UNDP shall not accept travel costs exceeding those of an economy class ticket. Should the IC wish to travel on a higher class he/she should do so using their own resources
In the event of unforeseeable travel not anticipated in this TOR, payment of travel costs including tickets, lodging and terminal expenses should be agreed upon, between the respective business unit and the Individual Consultant, prior to travel and will be reimbursed.
Evaluation Method and Criteria Individual consultants will be evaluated based on the following methodology:
Cumulative analysis The award of the contract shall be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as a) responsive/compliant/acceptable; and b) having received the highest score out of set of weighted technical criteria (70%). and financial criteria (30%). Financial score shall be computed as a ratio of the proposal being evaluated and the lowest priced proposal received by UNDP for the assignment.
Technical Criteria for Evaluation (Maximum 70 points)
Only candidates obtaining a minimum of 49 points (70% of the total technical points) would be considered for the Financial Evaluation.
Documentation required Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications. Please group them into one (1) single PDF document as the application only allows to upload maximum one document:
Note: Successful individual will be required to provide proof of medical insurance coverage before commencement of contract for the duration of the assignment.
Incomplete, joint proposals and proposals sent to the wrong mailing address will not be accepted and only candidates for whom there is further interest will be contacted. Individuals interested in this consultancy should apply and will be reviewed based on their own individual capacity. The successful individual may sign an Individual Contract with UNDP or request his/her employer to sign a Reimbursable Loan Agreement (RLA) on their behalf by indicating this in the Offerors letter to Confirming Interest and Availability using Annex II.
Annexes
Proposal Submission
Women applicants are encouraged to apply
|
|||||||||||||
To help us with our recruitment effort, please indicate in your cover/motivation letter where (ngotenders.net) you saw this job posting.
