Background |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Background: The UNDP/UNFPA/UNOPS/UNWOMEN Staff Council is undertaking a process to revise the current Constitution. The Constitution was last revised in 2013 and this review process aims to resolve any inconsistencies, clarify the roles and responsibilities of the Staff Council and make sure that the Constitution is relevant to the current context and needs of the constituency we serve and the Local Staff Associations.
The review will not attempt to change the mandate or core objectives of the Staff Council: Advocate for the rights, interests and welfare of personnel worldwide and promote a better understanding and mutual respect between the Management and personnel. The Staff Association derives its mandate from chapter VIII of the UN Staff Rules and Regulations (ST/SGB/2017/1) and its own Constitution (July 2013). The Staff Association is represented through a Staff Council of elected members in New York and through Local Staff Associations at country-level. Its elected members are fully accountable to the UNDP/UNFPA/UNOPS/ UNWOMEN Staff Association and personnel of the constituent agencies/entities. This constitution review process seeks to achieve the following:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duties and Responsibilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Scope of work:
Consultant will deliver final draft constitution to staff council who will work with polling officers to plan and administer referendum on revised constitution prior to adoption.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competencies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criteria for selection: Only those candidates who meet the minimum level of education and relevant years of experience requirements will be considered for the technical evaluation. The technical evaluation will include a desk review, and may also include interviews with shortlisted candidates. Combined scoring method – where the qualifications and methodology will be weighted a max of 70%, and combined with the price offer which will be weighted a max of 30%. Method: cumulative analysis method will be used to evaluate proposals. When using this weighted scoring method, the award of the contract will be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as:
Technical criteria weight: 70 (70% of total obtainable scores). Financial criteria weight: 30 (30% of total obtainable scores) Only candidates obtaining a minimum of 49 (70%) points on the technical part will be considered for the financial evaluation. Criteria and scores for technical evaluation (70 points maximum):
Criteria for financial evaluation (30 points maximum): The following formula will be used to evaluate financial proposal: p = y (µ/z), where p = points for the financial proposal being evaluated y = maximum number of points for the financial proposal: The award of contract will be made to the individual consultant who receives the highest combined score out of the weighted technical and financial criteria as specified above. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Required Skills and Experience |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criteria for selection: Only those candidates who meet the minimum level of education and relevant years of experience requirements will be considered for the technical evaluation. The technical evaluation will include a desk review, and may also include interviews with shortlisted candidates. Combined scoring method – where the qualifications and methodology will be weighted a max of 70%, and combined with the price offer which will be weighted a max of 30%. Method: cumulative analysis method will be used to evaluate proposals. When using this weighted scoring method, the award of the contract will be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as:
Technical criteria weight: 70 (70% of total obtainable scores). Financial criteria weight: 30 (30% of total obtainable scores) Only candidates obtaining a minimum of 49 (70%) points on the technical part will be considered for the financial evaluation. Criteria and scores for technical evaluation (70 points maximum):
Criteria for financial evaluation (30 points maximum): The following formula will be used to evaluate financial proposal: p = y (µ/z), where p = points for the financial proposal being evaluated y = maximum number of points for the financial proposal: The award of contract will be made to the individual consultant who receives the highest combined score out of the weighted technical and financial criteria as specified above. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To help us track our recruitment effort, please indicate in your cover/motivation letter where (ngotenders.net) you saw this job posting.
